Enshrining decentralisation in the Constitution: bury to give birth

By Yuriy Hanushchak, Director of the Territory Development Institute, for ZN.UA


At the Local Self-Government Forum on 5 December 2018, the Prime Minister of Ukraine stressed the need to amend the Constitution to enshrine achievements of power ​​decentralisation.

Failure to do so will endanger the imperceptible but systematic de facto wind-up of the reform by introducing changes to the laws and acts of the Government, as it was during Yanukovych’s time.

The presidential draft law (No. 2217-a), approved in the first reading, seems outdated after three years of actual implementation of decentralisation.

Insofar, there was a need to submit a new draft law with amendments to the Constitution, moreover, with no delay. Because the new parliamentary structure will most likely not give the required 300 votes for its final approval.

Of course, the new draft amendments to the Constitution should address the main tasks envisaged by the draft law No.2217-a, namely the creation of a three-tier system of administrative-territorial structure, delimitation of competences of the executive authorities and local self-government bodies at the subregional and regional levels, balance of LSG resources in accordance with the powers transferred to LSG bodies.

Сanonically pure amending of the Constitution has the following form: by the end of the current session, the Parliament will vote for the draft law No. 2217-a, failing it of course. At the beginning of the new session, the President presents new draft amendments to the Constitution, under a new name, emphasising not only decentralisation, but also the overall reform of the territorial organisation of power. After approval of the document by the Parliament, preferably until March 31, which is quite expected (since the failure to implement the decentralisation reform is not openly voiced by any political force at the moment), it will be submitted to the Constitutional Court. And already in early autumn the Parliament most probably will vote for its approval as a whole.

Whether such a technology will work or not depends on the head of state and the level of maturity of the political elite. The next chance to finally break away from the Soviet past, based on traditional political cycles, will appear not earlier than ten years later. In times of acceleration of globalisation and challenges, associated with it, this timeframe seems to be eternity.

The full version is available HERE

16.01.2019 - 14:14 | Views: 6042
Author list e04f5eff74bfb49c532a371719441f15

Author: Юрій Ганущак

Tags:

Constitution Yu.Hanushchak

Share the news:

Коментарі:

To add comment you should be authorized or sign_in
Read more:

13 July 2020

A new administrative and territorial arrangement or the division powers– what is coming first?

A new administrative and territorial...

Prior to creating a new administrative and territorial arrangement, it is thought to be necessary to make a decision...

13 July 2020

Місцеві бюджети: дані за січень-травень 2020 року

Місцеві бюджети: дані за січень-травень 2020 року

За даними офіційної звітності Державної казначейської служби України, протягом січня-травня 2020 року до місцевих...

13 July 2020

The MinDigital and U-LEAD with Europe have developed an interactive map of entrepreneurship support infrastructure

The MinDigital and U-LEAD with Europe have...

The Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, supported by the U-LEAD with Europe Programme, has developed and...

13 July 2020

The future of rayon authorities employees: what should be waited for following the reform

The future of rayon authorities employees: what...

«Any changes in the power territorial arrangement, powers redistribution and decentralisation will cause changes in...

13 July 2020

Who is dissatisfied with the new rayons formation and why?

Who is dissatisfied with the new rayons...

In his article for the Dzerkalo Tyzhnya (the Mirror of the Week), Deputy Minister of Development of Communities and...