By Oleksandr Vrublevskyi, expert consultant of the DESPRO project on starostas’ activity and cooperation of hromadas
With the appearance of starostas in the local self-government, they became one of the key figures in amalgamated hromadas and received a powerful mandate to represent the interests of residents of starosta districts in the executive committee of the hromada council. With this aim, the legislator fixed a provision, which made starostas the members of the hromada executive committee by their positions (Part 5 of Articles 14-1 and Part 4, Article 51 of the Law of Ukraine “On Local Self-Government in Ukraine”). In the AHs that include over twelve village/settlement councils, on the basis of which the corresponding starosta districts were formed, the starostas’ majority could have been formed in the AH executive committee, if it was not for one “but”.
Starostas’ majority in the AH executive committee occurs when the number of starostas in the executive committee exceeds its other members. Such a majority can be functionally stable in the process of executive committee’s decision-making.
The formation of starostas’ majority in some AHs, in my opinion, is hampered by at least three circumstances:
P.S. Additional questions to the author of the publication can be put in the Forum of Starostas http://forum.decentralization.gov.ua
The full version is available in Ukrainian – please click HERE
Share the news:
23 October 2018
Another original event was held by the participants of the Green Tourism Cluster “Five Pearls of the Dnieper”....
23 October 2018
The issue concerns the voluntary accession of Kunashivska rural hromada to the city of oblast significance of...