The use of the hromadas’ cooperation mechanism (IMC) allows to significantly expand access points to administrative services, improve their quality, save public resources.
The register of hromadas’ cooperation agreements, published on MinRegion’s website, contains information on 276 agreements as of 21.11.2018.
The absolute majority of contracts are concluded by hromadas, that are taking or took part in the U-LEAD with Europe Programme’s support to improved administrative service delivery.
With due account of the problems and challenges hromadas face while using of intermunicipal cooperation tool in the field of administrative services, the Programme propose to discuss a document describing opportunities and challenges in this area: https://goo.gl/5L6TUu
The Programme experts invite interested state authorities, local self-government bodies, LSG associations and other specialists to participate in the discussion of this document and its joint development.
Proposals, comments and remarks are accepted at the address mariia.tyshchenko@ulead.org.ua by 22 January 2019.
The full version is available in Ukrainian – please click HERE
Tags:
cooperation Administrative services
Source:
Програма «U-LEAD з Європою»
05 November 2026
Municipal Enterprises Reform: Polaris Programme...
The Polaris Programme “Supporting Multi-level Governance in Ukraine” has announced the selection results for...
05 November 2026
RESILIENT COMMUNITIES training programme completed!
RESILIENT COMMUNITIES training programme...
On 5 November, International Project Manager Day, the “Resilient Communities” training programme – developed by...
05 November 2026
Як розвивати співпрацю громад України та Румунії: висновки з Rebuilding Ukraine 2026
Як розвивати співпрацю громад України та...
Джерело - Facebook New Strategy Center Традиційно міжнародне муніципальне партнерство з Румунією є більш...
05 November 2026
Open Call for Experts to Conduct Technical...
The Polaris Programme: Support to Multi-Level Governance in Ukraine invites experts to submit their CVs for inclusion...